How Climate Action Supports Better Mental Health: Building a Resilient, Healthier Society

The intertwined challenges of climate change and mental health are reshaping how we think about well-being and sustainability. While climate action is essential to protect the environment, many climate strategies can also provide substantial mental health benefits. From reducing air pollution to promoting greener spaces and connecting communities, these initiatives have far-reaching impacts on both individuals and society. By aligning climate action with mental wellness, we can create a future that is resilient, supportive, and adaptable to the uncertainties of a changing world (Clayton et al., 2017).

Energy Efficiency: Warmer Homes, Reduced Financial Stress, and Improved Health

Improving energy efficiency through better insulation, renewable energy, and energy-efficient appliances has more than just environmental benefits—it makes living spaces healthier and more affordable. For families facing financial difficulties, the ability to keep their homes comfortably warm in winter and cool in summer is vital for reducing stress and supporting mental health (Liddell & Morris, 2010).

Fuel poverty, which refers to the inability to afford adequate heating or cooling, is associated with anxiety, depression, and even physical health issues. Energy efficiency improvements reduce these financial pressures, providing a sense of security that supports mental health. Additionally, energy-efficient homes often have improved air quality and reduced exposure to pollutants, alleviating respiratory issues and related mental health impacts (Thomson et al., 2017).

Active Transportation: Biking and Walking for Improved Physical and Mental Health

Promoting active transportation, such as walking and cycling, benefits mental health by encouraging physical activity, which is closely tied to improved mood, reduced anxiety, and lower stress levels (Pretty et al., 2005). When cities invest in bike lanes, sidewalks, and pedestrian-friendly spaces, they make it easier for people to adopt healthy habits into their daily routines.

Regular physical activity releases endorphins—natural mood lifters that reduce symptoms of anxiety and depression. Active transportation also helps build social connections. People who walk or cycle regularly often experience higher levels of happiness and life satisfaction due to increased social interaction and connection with their surroundings (Ma et al., 2018). Furthermore, reducing vehicular use improves air quality, contributing to broader community well-being.

Reduced Air and Noise Pollution for Mental and Physical Calm

The transition to cleaner transportation methods, such as electric buses, carpooling, and improved public transit, can dramatically reduce both air and noise pollution. Air pollution has been linked to increased rates of anxiety and depression, particularly among those with pre-existing mental health vulnerabilities (Braithwaite et al., 2019). Cleaner air also reduces the burden of chronic respiratory and cardiovascular illnesses, further decreasing stress.

Noise pollution, often overlooked, is a significant environmental stressor. Chronic exposure to high noise levels is associated with sleep disturbances, elevated stress hormones, and increased risk of depression (Stansfeld & Clark, 2015). Transitioning to quieter, greener infrastructure creates more peaceful environments that support mental well-being and cognitive clarity.

Access to Green and Blue Spaces: A Proven Remedy for Mental Stress

Green and blue spaces—parks, rivers, lakes, gardens—are powerful tools for improving mental health. Access to nature has been shown to reduce stress, anxiety, and symptoms of depression (Twohig-Bennett & Jones, 2018). Time spent in natural environments promotes relaxation, emotional resilience, and a greater sense of life satisfaction.

Urban greenery also mitigates the urban heat island effect, reducing risks associated with extreme heat, such as aggression and psychological distress (Gómez-Baggethun & Barton, 2013). Blue spaces, such as rivers and lakes, are associated with reductions in stress and increased positive affect (White et al., 2020). These environments offer accessible and cost-effective public health strategies for fostering mental well-being.

Community-Building and Social Support for Mental Resilience

Effective climate action fosters strong, interconnected communities. Community-based sustainability programs—such as clean-up drives, community gardens, and environmental education—encourage social interaction, enhance belonging, and buffer against stress (Albrecht, 2011). Social cohesion is a critical determinant of mental health, especially in the context of climate-related stressors like wildfires or flooding.

People embedded in supportive communities are more resilient and better able to cope with crises. These social bonds reduce feelings of loneliness and can improve collective efficacy, a crucial factor for adaptive capacity in the face of environmental change (Berry et al., 2010).

Environmental Education and a Sense of Purpose

Climate action empowers people with a sense of agency and purpose. This is particularly important for young people, who are increasingly experiencing eco-anxiety—a chronic fear of environmental doom (Clayton & Karazsia, 2020). When individuals, especially youth, are involved in meaningful environmental activities, they feel more hopeful and less helpless.

Education and engagement can transform eco-anxiety into climate hope, fostering proactive behaviors that improve both environmental and mental outcomes (Ojala, 2012). Participatory environmental programs provide outlets for collective action, which research shows can mitigate depressive symptoms and promote well-being through enhanced self-efficacy.

Moving Forward: Building a Climate-Ready, Mentally Resilient Future

At Green Mind, we understand that climate action is about more than just reducing emissions; it’s about creating communities where people feel safe, connected, and empowered. By aligning our efforts with both environmental and mental health goals, we’re laying the groundwork for a future that is resilient, adaptable, and compassionate.

The steps we take today to create a more climate-friendly society, whether through affordable energy solutions, green infrastructure, or community programs, are investments in a healthier, happier world. Through Green Mind, we are working to inspire and empower communities to take meaningful steps toward this future—reducing environmental impact while promoting mental resilience and collective well-being.

References

Albrecht, G. (2011). Chronic environmental change: Emerging “psychoterratic” syndromes. In Climate Change and Human Well-Being (pp. 43–56). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9742-5_3

Berry, H. L., Bowen, K., & Kjellstrom, T. (2010). Climate change and mental health: a causal pathways framework. International Journal of Public Health, 55(2), 123–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-009-0112-0

Braithwaite, I., Zhang, S., Kirkbride, J. B., Osborn, D. P. J., & Hayes, J. F. (2019). Air pollution (particulate matter) exposure and associations with depression, anxiety, bipolar, psychosis and suicide risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Environmental Health Perspectives, 127(12), 126002. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP4595

Clayton, S., & Karazsia, B. T. (2020). Development and validation of a measure of climate change anxiety. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 69, 101434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101434

Clayton, S., Manning, C. M., Krygsman, K., & Speiser, M. (2017). Mental health and our changing climate: Impacts, implications, and guidance. American Psychological Association and ecoAmerica. https://ecoamerica.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/mental-health-and-our-changing-climate.pdf

Gómez-Baggethun, E., & Barton, D. N. (2013). Classifying and valuing ecosystem services for urban planning. Ecological Economics, 86, 235–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.08.019

Liddell, C., & Morris, C. (2010). Fuel poverty and human health: A review of recent evidence. Energy Policy, 38(6), 2987–2997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.01.037

Ma, L., Dill, J., & Mohr, C. (2018). The objective and perceived built environment: What matters for bicycling? Transportation, 41(5), 1125–1147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-018-9939-1

Ojala, M. (2012). Hope and climate change: The importance of hope for environmental engagement among young people. Environmental Education Research, 18(5), 625–642. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2011.637157

Pretty, J., Peacock, J., Sellens, M., & Griffin, M. (2005). The mental and physical health outcomes of green exercise. International Journal of Environmental Health Research, 15(5), 319–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/09603120500155963

Stansfeld, S. A., & Clark, C. R. (2015). Health effects of noise exposure in children. Current Environmental Health Reports, 2(2), 171–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40572-015-0044-1

Thomson, H., Thomas, S., Sellstrom, E., & Petticrew, M. (2017). Housing improvements for health and associated socio-economic outcomes: A systematic review. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (2). https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008657.pub2

Twohig-Bennett, C., & Jones, A. (2018). The health benefits of the great outdoors: A systematic review and meta-analysis of greenspace exposure and health outcomes. Environmental Research, 166, 628–637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2018.06.030

White, M. P., Elliott, L. R., Gascon, M., Roberts, B., & Fleming, L. E. (2020). Blue space, health and well-being: A narrative overview and synthesis of potential benefits. Environmental Research, 191, 110169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.110169

Written By:

Inaam Chattha